The common alloy aluminum sheet sunset reviews put significant 2027 deadlines on the calendar for importers, producers, customs brokers, and downstream users. With antidumping and countervailing duty orders covering 16 countries under review, affected businesses should preserve participation rights, maintain accurate case data, and separate drawback-eligible duties from AD/CVD amounts.
What the Full CAAS Sunset Reviews Cover
Countries and Orders Under Review
The U.S. International Trade Commission scheduled full five-year reviews of countervailing duty orders on common alloy aluminum sheet from Bahrain, India, and Turkey. It also scheduled full reviews of antidumping duty orders covering Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and Turkey.
These proceedings will determine whether revoking the orders would likely lead to the continuation or recurrence of material injury to a U.S. industry within a reasonably foreseeable period. The reviews were designated extraordinarily complicated, permitting the review period to be extended by up to 90 days. That designation reflects the breadth of the country coverage, the number of participating industries, and the factual complexity typically involved in evaluating market conditions across multiple national sources.
What a Full Review Means for Importers
A full sunset review is more extensive than an expedited review. It generally includes questionnaires, staff analysis, written briefs, a hearing, posthearing submissions, and final comments. Importers, foreign producers, domestic producers, purchasers, and other interested parties may present evidence concerning likely import volumes, pricing behavior, market conditions, and potential injury if the orders are revoked.
The scheduling of a review does not suspend the existing orders. Importers should generally expect current AD/CVD cash deposit requirements and entry procedures to remain in effect while the proceedings continue. The review schedule also does not itself change product scope or company-specific rates. Scope rulings, administrative reviews, circumvention inquiries, changed circumstances reviews, and other Commerce proceedings can separately affect whether merchandise is covered or what deposit rate applies.
Critical Filing and Hearing Dates
Appearance and APO Deadlines
Parties seeking formal participation should prioritize the entry-of-appearance deadline. Entries of appearance are due 45 days after the October 14, 2026 publication date, producing a calculated date of November 28, 2026. Because that date falls on a Saturday, counsel and participating businesses should confirm the applicable filing treatment and avoid waiting until the final day. Filings are generally made through the USITC Electronic Document Information System.
Counsel seeking access to business proprietary information under an administrative protective order, commonly called an APO, faces the same 45-day period. Parties that already entered an appearance or obtained APO access after institution of the reviews generally do not need to submit those materials again. Internal legal teams should nevertheless confirm that counsel, authorized applicants, and corporate entities are correctly identified in the proceeding.
March and April 2027 Schedule
The prehearing staff report is scheduled for placement on the nonpublic record on March 1, 2027, followed by a public version. Prehearing briefs are due by 5:15 p.m. on March 9. Requests to appear at the hearing are due by 5:15 p.m. on March 10.
If required, the prehearing conference will occur at 9:30 a.m. on March 17. Written testimony and presentation slides are due by noon that day. The in-person hearing is scheduled for 9:30 a.m. on March 18, 2027.
Posthearing briefs and written statements from nonparties are due by 5:15 p.m. on March 29. Additional information not previously available for comment is scheduled for release on April 22. Final comments are due by 5:15 p.m. on April 26. Trade compliance teams should place these dates on a shared calendar and build internal review time ahead of each formal cutoff.
Compliance and Drawback Implications
Maintain Accurate AD/CVD Entry Controls
Importers of common alloy aluminum sheet should confirm that brokers and internal systems use the correct country of origin, manufacturer, exporter, case number, scope determination, and cash deposit rate. Product descriptions alone are rarely sufficient for AD/CVD controls. Alloy, thickness, width, heat treatment, form, processing, and end use may all become relevant when evaluating whether a particular aluminum product falls within an order.
Recent activity involving aluminum can stock and composite panels illustrates why scope analysis must remain product-specific. Certain can stock has received partial relief through separate proceedings, while some bonded or composite aluminum products may remain within other CAAS orders depending on their construction and processing. Importers should not apply an exclusion or scope conclusion across countries, suppliers, or product configurations without validating that the underlying determination covers the merchandise at issue.
Separate AD/CVD From Drawback-Eligible Duties
Antidumping and countervailing duties are not eligible for duty drawback. Ordinary customs duties paid on the same import entry may still qualify when the statutory and operational requirements for exportation or destruction are satisfied. Drawback calculations must therefore isolate AD/CVD amounts rather than treating the total duty paid on an entry as potentially recoverable.
For customs brokers and drawback filers, this separation should occur at the entry-line and duty-type level. Source records should preserve entered value, ordinary duty, special tariff duties, antidumping deposits, countervailing deposits, merchandise identifiers, and relevant export or destruction data. Controls should prevent ineligible AD/CVD amounts from flowing into calculated refund values.
Prepare for Multiple Possible Outcomes
If the ITC determines that revocation would likely cause continuation or recurrence of material injury, the relevant orders will generally remain in place. If that standard is not met for a particular order, revocation may follow through the applicable administrative process. Importers should model both outcomes without assuming that every country or order will receive identical treatment.
- On October 14, 2026, the U.S. International Trade Commission published a notice (91 FR 65253) scheduling full five-year sunset reviews of the CVD orders on common alloy aluminum sheet from Bahrain, India, and Turkey, plus the AD orders from 16 countries (Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and Turkey). The reviews were deemed extraordinarily complicated, with the period extended by up to 90 days. An in-person hearing is set for March 18, 2027, at 9:30 a.m., with prehearing staff reports due March 1, 2027, and appearance requests by March 10, 2027.
- On October 2, 2026, the Department of Commerce self-initiated a circumvention inquiry to determine if certain aluminum composite panels produced in China by Shanghai Alumetal Decorative Material Co. (with LDPE cores between 1100-alloy aluminum sheets totaling 6.3 mm or less in thickness) are circumventing the existing AD/CVD orders on common alloy aluminum sheet from China.
- On October 8, 2026, Commerce issued a scope ruling that aluminum composite panels imported by Hong Kong Harbour Company Limited (thermoplastic core between two aluminum alloy sheets) fall within the AD/CVD orders on common alloy aluminum sheet from China, citing non-exhaustive scope language that covers further processing such as bonding.
- On September 24, 2026, Commerce published final results of changed circumstances reviews, partially revoking the AD/CVD orders on common alloy aluminum sheet from China and the 16 countries (plus others) with respect to certain aluminum can stock, following a finding of changed circumstances.
- No significant practitioner discussions on X were identified in the past 30 days regarding these ITC reviews or related CAAS orders.
Frequently Asked Questions
What Is a Five-Year Sunset Review?
A five-year sunset review evaluates whether an antidumping or countervailing duty order should remain in effect. Commerce generally considers whether dumping or subsidization is likely to continue or recur, while the ITC evaluates likely continuation or recurrence of material injury. An order ordinarily remains active while the review is pending.
Which Countries Are Included in the CAAS Reviews?
The countervailing duty reviews cover Bahrain, India, and Turkey. The antidumping duty reviews cover Bahrain, Brazil, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, India, Indonesia, Italy, Oman, Romania, Serbia, Slovenia, South Africa, Spain, Taiwan, and Turkey. China is not part of this specific 16-country sunset review schedule.
Does the March 2027 Hearing Change Current Duty Rates?
No. The hearing provides an opportunity for participating parties to present testimony and respond to questions concerning likely injury. It does not itself change cash deposit rates, product scope, or entry instructions. Any rate or scope changes generally arise through separate proceedings and implementation steps.
Can AD/CVD Payments Be Included in a Drawback Claim?
No. Antidumping and countervailing duties are not recoverable through duty drawback. However, eligible ordinary customs duties paid on the same entry may still support drawback when qualifying merchandise is exported or destroyed. Claim calculations should segregate each duty type and exclude all AD/CVD amounts from the requested refund.
What Should Customs Brokers Do Before the Hearing?
Brokers should validate case numbers, manufacturer and exporter combinations, country-of-origin data, deposit rates, and product scope documentation. They should also communicate the procedural schedule to affected importer clients, retain entry records, and ensure that drawback workflows distinguish recoverable ordinary duties from ineligible AD/CVD payments.
How Stable Software Can Help
Strengthen Drawback Calculations Without Sharing the Refund
The CAAS reviews reinforce the need for customs brokers to keep AD/CVD payments outside duty drawback calculations while preserving eligible ordinary duty amounts. DrawbackAI is flat-license duty drawback software that U.S. customs brokers can white-label for importer clients and use to file under their own filer code.
Stable Software charges a flat software license and never takes a percentage of the importer’s refund. Brokers seeking to expand or standardize drawback services can evaluate whether DrawbackAI fits their operating model while maintaining control of client relationships, filings, and filer-code usage.
Resources
| Type | Resource |
|---|---|
| Source | Primary source |
