Comparisons
Compare Stable
How Stable stacks up against other customs and trade-compliance platforms, laid out honestly.
Stable vs DutyCalc
How Stable and DutyCalc compare for duty drawback: matching engine, MPF handling, filing, interface, and why Stable is the modern seat that replaces legacy drawback software.
Read comparison →Stable vs Pax AI
How Stable and Pax AI compare for duty drawback and recovery: flat-license broker platform versus contingency filer running its own brokerage, and who owns the client relationship.
Read comparison →Stable vs Zollback
How Stable and Zollback compare for duty drawback: the same global-optimization matching argument, but flat-license broker platform versus contingency filer with a forwarder referral program.
Read comparison →Stable vs Caspian
How Stable and Caspian compare for duty drawback: Caspian's contingency 'works alongside your broker' model versus Stable's flat-license, white-label platform that is the broker's own software.
Read comparison →Stable vs Descartes
How Stable and Descartes compare for duty recovery and drawback: a focused, flat-license broker-channel platform versus a broad enterprise global trade suite with duty recovery via MSR Customs.
Read comparison →Stable vs MIC
How Stable and MIC (MIC Customs Solutions) compare for duty recovery and drawback: a focused, flat-license broker-channel drawback platform versus a global, multi-country customs compliance suite built for multinationals.
Read comparison →Stable vs SAP GTS
How Stable and SAP GTS (SAP Global Trade Services) compare for duty drawback: an ERP-native global trade compliance module for SAP enterprises versus a focused, ERP-agnostic, flat-license drawback platform for the broker channel.
Read comparison →Stable vs ONESOURCE
How Stable and Thomson Reuters ONESOURCE Global Trade compare for duty drawback: a focused, flat-license broker-channel drawback platform versus a broad enterprise global trade management suite with drawback as one module.
Read comparison →Stable vs e2open
How Stable and e2open compare for duty drawback: a focused, flat-license broker-channel drawback platform versus a broad connected supply-chain and global trade suite (which absorbed Amber Road).
Read comparison →Stable vs CargoWise
How Stable and CargoWise (WiseTech Global) compare for duty drawback: the logistics execution platform that runs forwarding and brokerage operations versus a dedicated, flat-license drawback recovery engine that runs alongside it.
Read comparison →Stable vs Charter Brokerage
How Stable and Charter Brokerage compare for duty drawback: a full-service specialist (part of Berkshire Hathaway) that runs recovery for large importers directly versus flat-license software your own brokerage runs under its POA.
Read comparison →Stable vs Comstock & Holt
How Stable and Comstock & Holt compare for duty drawback: a legacy full-service specialist with deep CBP credibility and proprietary software versus a modern, flat-license drawback platform your brokerage runs itself.
Read comparison →Stable vs J.M. Rodgers
How Stable and J.M. Rodgers compare for duty drawback: an established specialist drawback brokerage that files as a service versus flat-license software your own brokerage runs under its POA.
Read comparison →Stable vs Alliance Drawback Services
How Stable and Alliance Drawback Services (and its Apollo software) compare for duty drawback: the most software-forward of the legacy specialists versus a pure flat-license platform your own brokerage runs under its POA.
Read comparison →Stable vs Flexport
How Stable and Flexport compare for duty drawback: drawback bundled into a freight platform for importers who already ship with it, versus a dedicated, flat-license drawback recovery engine for the broker channel.
Read comparison →
See Stable on your own workflows.
Book a 30-minute walkthrough. We will show you the modules that fit your operation and how fast they go live.